Education

Healthcare

Government

Business

Non-Compliance Risks

 

 

IMPORTANT CHANGES IN HIPAA REGULATIONS ENACTED

 by HIPAA Solutions, LC

February 16, 2009

(A Note to the Reader - The information contained in this document is meant for informational purposes only and not intended to act as a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Please contact appropriate legal counsel before acting on any of the information contained in this document.)

The material in this document summarizes major enforcement changes in the HIPAA laws as a result of the stimulus bill that has been passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.  The changes in the HIPAA Privacy and Security rule are significant and will have a major impact on healthcare providers as well as “non-covered entities”. 

Although there are a wide variety of changes in the bill, including increased individual rights, the focus of this document will be on providing a summary of the changes involving enforcement.  It must be noted that elements of the stimulus bill involve changes in both HIPAA privacy and security rules.  

Consequently, compliance efforts must be undertaken that involve taking specific actions and documenting those actions as required by law.  In addition, the enforcement provisions outlined below indicate that an approach to compliance that uses a strategy of “quick fixes” through technology will not suffice to address the new regulatory requirements. 

Healthcare organizations must become proactive in their compliance efforts and understand that “voluntary compliance” is no longer the state of the regulatory environment.  Specific actions involving comprehensive business process and technology efforts must be undertaken to achieve and maintain compliance in the future.

Summary of Changes:

The new rules REQUIRE mandatory audits of CE’s and BA’s to ensure HIPAA compliance.  The rules also require the Secretary of HHS to report to Congress on the number of audits performed and the outcome of these audits.  Other enforcement statistics must also be provided to Congress.

The rules give Attorney Generals in every State the ability to sue (bring a civil action) on behalf of residents of the State against “any person” violating HIPAA in a Federal District court.  The rules provide for statutory damages and State AG’s will be able to utilize private law firms to assist in carrying out their obligations under this section of the new rules.

Under the new regulations, it is very clear that Business Associates (BA’s) MUST follow the same Privacy and Security rules as Covered Entities (CE’s).  The new rules also specifically state that BA’s and CE’s will be held EQUALLY liable in relation to civil and criminal penalties associated with violating HIPAA. 

The changes in the HIPAA rules incorporate very strong breach notification requirements.  For example, both BA’s and CE’s MUST implement the following breach notification requirements when a breach is discovered under the new rules.

The CE MUST notify every individual whose “unsecured PHI” information has been breached.  In addition, after a breach has been discovered, the CE MUST notify every individual that the CE “reasonably believes” has had their unsecured PHI breached, i.e., accessed, acquired or disclosed as a result of the actual breach itself. 

Following the discovery of a breach, the BA MUST notify the CE of that breach of unsecured PHI.  In addition, the “notice shall include the identification of each individual whose unsecured protected health information has been, or is reasonably believed by the business associate to have been, accessed, acquired, or disclosed during such breach.”

A breach is treated as discovered by both the CE or BA on the first day the breach is known to the CE or BA, meaning, “any person, other than the individual committing the breach, that is an employee, officer, other agent” of either the BA or CE, respectively, “or should reasonably have been known to such entity or associate (or person) to have occurred.”

CE’s and BA’s MUST provide notification as required by law respectively, within 60 calendar days after discovery of a breach.  The burden of proof is on the CE or BA with regard to demonstrating that all notification requirements were met. 

CE’s MUST provide notification as follows:

New rules involve the direct application of both civil and criminal penalties to a BA, in the event the BA violates HIPAA.

The Treatment, Payment and Health Care Operations, or TPO exceptions in relation to the Accounting of Disclosures Rule, have been eliminated for Electronic Health Records (EHRs).  In certain cases, this will go into effect for some covered entities as early as 2011.  In addition, there are significant changes associated with the “minimum necessary rule” and “accounting of disclosures” relating to both BA’s and CE’s.  

New prohibitions on the sale of EHR’s or PHI are established.

New breach notification requirements are established for vendors of personal health records (PHR’s).  Changes involve enforcement through the Federal Trade Commission, specifically unfair and deceptive acts and practices for vendors of PHRs. 

New rules provide clarification on how rules impacting Regional Health Information Organizations, e-Prescribing Gateways and Health Information Exchange Organizations will generally be incorporated into HIPAA.

New rules provide clarification on “wrongful disclosures” and make it a criminal offense to violate the Privacy rule’s authorization requirements.

Another level of civil liability is added to rules relating to willfully neglecting HIPAA compliance.  This includes mandatory investigations and civil or criminal penalties associated with this type of violation.

New rules utilize fines to further federal enforcement activities.

New rules enable the distribution of fine revenues to harmed individuals.

The new rules significantly increase civil money penalties that eliminate previous defenses for non-compliance.  For example, a tiered penalty structure is outlined that enables fines to be levied against “persons” that did not know about the need for compliance, up to $25,000.00 for one calendar year for one “identical violation.”  In other words, a specific violation of an “identical requirement or prohibition” may not exceed $25,000.00 during a calendar year.  

Fines apply to persons that willfully neglect to comply with HIPAA and range from $10,000.00 per violation to $50,000.00 per violation, up to $1.5 million per calendar year for one “identical violation,”  if corrective action is not taken in the case of willful neglect to comply with HIPAA.  In other words, a specific violation of an “identical requirement or prohibition” may not exceed $1.5 million during a calendar year. 

The rules enable the Office of Civil Rights within the Department of Health and Human Services on the federal level to continue to use “corrective action plans” to enforce HIPAA.

____________________________________

A compliance strategy incorporating accurate assessments of compliance status is recommended for all all organizations that are subject to HIPAA.  Assessments should include evaluations of compliance with both the Privacy and Security rules of HIPAA.

Contact HIPAA Solutions, LC toll free at (877) 779-3004 or email info@hipaasolutions.org with questions or to discuss compliance resources.